The High Court, in an application under Section 482 CrPC, heard a submission for quashing criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement acknowledged by both the applicant and the State. The order listed parties to record statements at the trial court and reserved the file for a fresh date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11015 of 2024
Applicant :- Santosh Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anita Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Singh Sangwan,J.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024 Mukesh
Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 354, 354(D), 504, and 506 IPC should be quashed following an amicable settlement between parties.
Whether cognizance taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate against the applicant warrants quashing in light of the compromise.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Santosh Gupta
State Of U.P.
Arvind Singh Sangwan
Mukesh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
