It is in the aforesaid backdrop that the suit came to be tried before the trial court and on 30.01.2022, the petitioner filed an application stating therein that though there was an interim protection granted by the High Court directing that the parties would not alienate the property in question, however, the defendants had tampered with the standing crop of the petitioner. As a result, with the intervention of the police, the private respondent was able to remove the crop and about 175 quintals which, as per the petitioner, was valued at Rs. 3,41,250/- along with the costs must be restituted to the petitioners and in the aforesaid context, it sought a relief that the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court may be implemented and the sum of Rs. 3,41,250/- be made good to the petitioner from the private respondent and if required, the protection be granted to the petitioner for sowing crop and also the police aid. The said application after due context came to be rejected by the trial court on 20.10.2022 holding that the relief which has been claimed by the petitioner could only be granted finally after the parties could lead evidence. This did not find favour with the petitioner who challenged the same by filing a civil revision which with the reasoning as adopted by the trial court was rejected on 16.12.2023.
