In this Article 227 writ petition, the State filed an unopposed affidavit. Finding the petition now infructuous based on the affidavit's averments, this Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14267
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 690 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ram Kinkar And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vipin Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Heard.
In terms of earlier order of this Court, an affidavit has been filed by the State, which is taken on record.
Taking note of the averments made in the affidavit, which has not been opposed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, this Court finds that the present petition has now become infructuous.
It is dismissed , accordingly.
Order Date :- 19.2.2024 Jyoti/-
Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Kinkar And 3 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
