Disposed

Ram Lal v. Consolidation Officer, 1 , Sadar, Sultanpur and Others

Allahabad HC6 Dec 2024A227/5891/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was a matter under Article 227 where the petitioner sought expeditious disposal of a recall application pending since 2019. The High Court directed the Consolidation Officer to decide the case within four months after hearing, dispensing with notice to other respondents. The Court clarified it did not examine the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider and decide pending proceedings of Case No. 715 most expeditiously within four months.

Ram Lal vs Consolidation Officer, 1 , Sadar… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:82464

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5891 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Ram Lal Respondent :- Consolidation Officer, 1 , Sadar, Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 to 8 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his recall application moved by the petitioner on 27.11.2019 in the Case No.715 under Rule of 109 of U.P.C.H. Rule 1954, which is pending before the respondent No.1 since 2019.

¶9

It is urged that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Case No.715 most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of four months from the date an authenticated copy of this order is placed

¶12

before the authority concerned.

¶13

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of the petitioner on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 10.12.2024 ank

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Lal v. Consolidation Officer, 1 , Sadar, Sultanpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Lal v. Consolidation Officer, 1 , Sadar, Sultanpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sahaj Ram Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Barabanki and 7 Others

Avadh Bihari Tripathi and 3 Others Vs Dy. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Pratapgarh and 8 Others

Khurshed Ahmad and 3 Others Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gonda and 4 Others

Mohd. Juber vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Ramfer and 4 Others vs Commissioner Devi Patan Division Gonda and 13 Others

Smt. Rampati and Others vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur and Others