Disposed

Paras Nath v. Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyo Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Allahabad HC11 Dec 2024A227/5469/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Under Article 227, the Court dispensed with notice to private respondents and directed the Respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings expeditiously. The petitioner was required to furnish an undertaking not to seek unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide Case No.751 of 2023 expeditiously; petitioner to furnish an undertaking against unnecessary adjournments.

Paras Nath Vs Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyo Tehsil… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:82906

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5469 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Paras Nath Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyo Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- D.P. Dutt Tiwari,Dharmendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for he petitioner is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶8

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos.2 and 3 is dispensed with.

¶9

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No.751 of 2023, Computerized No.T202304040200751 (Paras Nath Vs. Ram Dularey) pending before the respondent No.1.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.751 of 2023, Computerized No.T202304040200751 (Paras Nath Vs. Ram Dularey) as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶13

The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order.

¶14

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶15

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶16

Order Date :- 11.12.2024 Ashutosh

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Paras Nath v. Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyo Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paras Nath v. Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyo Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Kumar Prajapati and 6 and Others Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Sultanpur and 2 Others

Sant Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Prabhawati Vs Consolidation Officer Iiird, Bahraich and 3 Others

Meena Devi vs Naib Tehsildar, Jahangirganj, Tehsil- Aalapur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Shabbir Ahmad and Others Vs D.D.C. and Others

Dharampal Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others