Counsel for the petitioner voluntarily withdrew the matter, and the court dismissed the petition under Article 227 with liberty to pursue available remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:70068
Court No. - 12
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4613 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Saxena Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitabh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Pankaj Shukla
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he does not want to press this petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law.
To the aforesaid prayer, there is no objection.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents, if any, to the learned counsel for the petitioner, as per Rules in this regard.
Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Vinay/-
Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ajay Kumar Saxena
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another
Vinay Kumar
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
