Petitioner sought Article 227 direction for speedy disposal of a land revenue case delayed due to advocates on strike. The bench held that since the delay was caused by striking advocates, no direction to the authority was appropriate, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63902
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4424 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Urmila Devi
Respondent :- Devta Deen And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Ojha Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
dismissed .
Order Date :- 17.9.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct expeditious disposal of a case delayed by advocates on strike under Article 227.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Urmila Devi
Devta Deen
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
