Disposed

Shitla Prasad Yadav v. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial ), Tehsil Lambhua, Sultanpur and Others

Allahabad HC3 Sept 2024A227/4186/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition under Article 227 seeking expedited disposal of a suit pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate was considered. The High Court directed the respondent to decide the matter expeditiously, affording full hearing opportunities, without unnecessary adjournments, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide Suit No.RST/252/2006-2007 most expeditiously without unnecessary adjournment.

Shitla Prasad Yadav vs Sub Divisional… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:60268

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4186 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad Yadav Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial ), Tehsil Lambhua, Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent No.4.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 and 3 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Suit No.RST/252/2006-2007, Computerized Case No.T200704683111, under Section 229B of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, pending before the respondent No.1.

¶9

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the case has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Suit No.RST/252/2006-2007, Computerized Case No.T200704683111 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible provided that there is no legal impediment in doing so.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 3.9.2024 Rakesh/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shitla Prasad Yadav v. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial ), Tehsil Lambhua, Sultanpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shitla Prasad Yadav v. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial ), Tehsil Lambhua, Sultanpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Deep Mala Vs Tahsildar, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Jhumak Lal and Another Vs Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Hamidul Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Prema @ Prem Kumari vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Indra Pal and Others vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Pratapgarh and Others

Shakeela Hussain and Others vs Ram Chandra Kesarwani and Others