Disposed

Deep Mala v. Tahsildar, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Allahabad HC2 Sept 2024A227/4114/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 227 sought expeditious disposal of pending proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Court directed the authority to finally decide the matter within six months, affording hearing opportunities but granting no unnecessary adjournments, contingent on the petitioner furnishing an appropriate undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Direction to dispose of case T2021040401561 under Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within six months, affording full hearing opportunity but no unnecessary adjournments, pending undertaking by petit

Deep Mala vs Tahsildar, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:59977

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4114 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Deep Mala Respondent :- Tahsildar, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.2 and 3 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No.T2021040401561 (Deepmala vs Babulal) filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.T2021040401561 (Deepmala vs Babulal) filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six months from the date an authenticated copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned.

¶12

The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order.

¶13

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of

¶14

either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶15

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶16

Order Date :- 2.9.2024 Harshita

¶17

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Deep Mala v. Tahsildar, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deep Mala v. Tahsildar, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manjay Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. and 19 Others

Yaseer Khan and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Gram Panchayat Basantpur Udal, Tehsil Nanpara, Bahraich Thru. Pradhan Namely Ram Kishun Sonkar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Smt. Sahida Begum Vs State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Sultanpur and Others

Sabhajeet Yadav vs Up Zila Adhikari Judicial, Tehsil Aalapur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Indrasen Yadav vs Naib Tehsildar, Gosaiganj, Ayodhya and Another