High Court exercised its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to direct the Lower Court to expedite proceedings in a pending trial and record reasons for delay, filling the interregnum as per IPC.
Directed the learned Judicial Magistrate to expedite trial and record reasons for delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58014
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3991 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Manau Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D.) Sadar Dist. Pratapgarh And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manuvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[ Subhash Vidyarthi,J.]
Order Date :- 27.8.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned Judicial Magistrate failed to expedite trial under Article 227.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Manau
Civil Judge (J.D.) Sadar Dist. Pratapgarh
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
