Disposed

Anil Kumar and Another v. Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Barabanki and Another

Allahabad HC23 Jul 2024A227/3336/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 227, the High Court directed the Consolidation Officer to decide a pending recall/restoration application and an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act within three months, while reserving final merits for the concerned authority.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Consolidation Officer to decide the recall/restoration application and application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act within three months.

Anil Kumar and Another vs Consolidation Officer… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:49411

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3336 of 2024 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar And Another Respondent :- Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Barabanki And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitesh Pratap Singh,Abhijeet P. Singh Chauhan,Ashutosh Goswami,Neetu Bhardwaj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing counsel for the State.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.2 is dispensed with.

¶7

The petitioners have approached this Court with the limited prayer directing the opposite party no.1/Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Barabanki, to decide the pending recall/restoration application dated 07.12.2023 along with application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in a Case no.Bajdayar/315 (Naumilal vs State) expeditiously.

¶8

In view of the aforesaid, it is prayed that the said case may be directed to be decided expeditiously within some time frame.

¶9

Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as from the perusal of the record, this Court is of the prima facie opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be met by directing the opposite party no.1/Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Barabanki, to decide the recall/restoration application dated 07.12.2023 along with application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in a Case no.Bajdayar/315 (Naumilal vs State) as expeditiously as possible, however, keeping in mind that full opportunity of hearing is to be provided to the parties concerned and endevour should be made to decide the same within a period of 3 months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the Court concerned.

¶10

It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court shall be free to decide the aforesaid application strictly in accordance with law.

¶11

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 23.7.2024/Harshita

¶13

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Anil Kumar and Another v. Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Barabanki and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar and Another v. Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Barabanki and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shubham Singh Alias Sibbu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Narendra Dev Singh Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Faizabad and Others

Seema Bano Vs State of U.P. Thru. Tehsildar Tehsil Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur and Others

Kailashi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Ors.

Madhuri Devi vs State Election Commission, U.P., Thru. Election Commissioner and Others

Suresh Chandra Mishra vs Sri Anand Kumar Singh, Managing Director Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd. Lko.