Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition under Article 226, which had been dismissed as not pressed. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed; petitioner permitted to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:29224
Court No. - 18
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1802 of 2024
Petitioner :- Mohammad Istiyaq Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Laxmi Verma,Rina Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition at this stage as dismissed as not pressed.
Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.
On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
Office is directed to return the certified copies of the relevant documents annexed with the present writ petition after retaining the photostat copies of the same.
Order Date :- 10.4.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohammad Istiyaq
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko And 12 Others
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
