The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 as not pressed, granting liberty to file afresh. The petitioner requested withdrawal due to inadvertence in the facts presented. The court directed the office to return certified copies and retain photostats.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:28907
Court No. - 18
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1745 of 2024
Petitioner :- Dheeraj Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- Ahibaran Singh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K.S. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to some inadvertence, certain facts are left to be mentioned in the present writ petition and made the prayer accordingly. He prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
Office is directed to return the certified copies of the relevant documents annexed with the present writ petition and retain the photostat copies of the same.
Order Date :- 9.4.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dheeraj Singh and 2 Others
Ahibaran Singh and 3 Others
Manish Kumar
Nitesh Kumar Tewary
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
