Petitioner sought a direction to expedite decision of his guardianship case pending before the Principal Family Judge, Allahabad. The High Court disposed of the petition at admission stage without notice, directing the court below to decide the case after hearing all parties preferably within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:179870
Court No. - 9
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13654 of 2024
Petitioner :- Abhishek Yadav Respondent :- Khemraj And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anup Yadav,Yatindra
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
"(i) Issue a suitable order or direction for deciding the Case No. 793 of 2024 (Abhishek Yadav Vs. Khemraj and 3 Others) filed under Section 25 of the Hindu Guardianship and Ward Act, 1890 read with Section 7 of the Family Court Act, 1984 and Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, pending before the learned Principal Family Judge, Allahabad under an stipulated period as the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to deem fit in this regard."
Order Date :- 18.11.2024 V.S.Singh
Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Family Court be directed to decide the guardianship case under Section 25 of the Hindu Guardianship and Ward Act within a stipulated period?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Abhishek Yadav
Khemraj
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
