Disposed

Om Prakash and Another v. Addl. Sub Divisional Officer Mandal Ayodhya Tahsil Sadar Dist. Ayodhya and 15 Others

Allahabad HC14 Mar 2024A227/1269/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the inordinate delay in deciding a partition suit under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The court directed the Additional Sub Divisional Officer to decide the pending case within six months without adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent No.1 to decide Case No. 7700/2023 within six months without adjournments.

Om Prakash and Another vs Addl. Sub Divisional Officer Mandal… — Partition | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:22331

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1269 of 2024 Petitioner :- Om Prakash And Another Respondent :- Addl. Sub Divisional Officer Mandal Ayodhya Tahsil Sadar Dist. Ayodhya And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Vikram Singh,Akshaya Pratap Singh,Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Pandey,Mohan Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned State counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3/Gram Panchayat concerned and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the contesting respondent Nos. 4 to 8.

¶6

In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to remaining private-respondents is hereby dispensed with.

¶7

By means of this petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of Case No. 7700/2023, Computerized Case No. T202304230107700 (Ajay Prakash and others vs. Om Prakash and others) filed under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending before the respondent No. 1/Additional Sub Divisional Officer, Mandal- Ayodhya, Tahsil- Sadar, District- Ayodhya.

¶8

Taking note of Rule 109(10) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as per which, a suit for partition preferred under Section 116 of the Code of 2006 should preferably be decided within a period of six months, however, in the instant case, the case, in issue, has not been disposed of till date despite the fact that the same is pending since July, 2023, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Case No. 7700/2023, Computerized Case No. T202304230107700 (Ajay Prakash and others vs. Om Prakash and others) after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case.

¶9

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶10

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶11

Order Date :- 14.3.2024/Arun/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Om Prakash and Another v. Addl. Sub Divisional Officer Mandal Ayodhya Tahsil Sadar Dist. Ayodhya and 15 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash and Another v. Addl. Sub Divisional Officer Mandal Ayodhya Tahsil Sadar Dist. Ayodhya and 15 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Bahal and Others Vs Asstt. Director of Consolidation Sultanpur and Others

Ganga Ram Vs Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil Utrayla, Balrampur and Others

Ghanshyam and 2 Others Vs Up Zila Adhikari Kunda Distt. Pratapgarh and 6 Others

Pankaj Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Mohd. Yaqoob Vs D.D.C.Barabanki and Others

Om Prakash and Another Vs Addl. Sub Divisional Officer Mandal Ayodhya Tahsil Sadar Dist. Ayodhya and 15 Others