Disposed

Ram Sagar v. Board of Revenue U.P Lko. Thru. Its Chairman and 2 Others

Allahabad HC7 Mar 2024A227/1173/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought directions for the Board of Revenue to decide a pending restoration application under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Board to decide the application expeditiously within two months, after hearing the parties and considering the delay, while reserving the merits for the authority.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the Board of Revenue to decide the restoration application expeditiously within two months.

Ram Sagar vs Board of Revenue U.P Lko. Thru. Its… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:20583

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1173 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Sagar Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla,Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶5

Heard.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with.

¶7

The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶8

"a. issue order or direction to the opposite party no.1 to decide the Restoration application dated 16.10.2023 bearing No.2926 of 2023, in Revision No.607/2018, Computerized Case No.R-2018171400607, Ram Sagar V/s Sadhu Saran and another, under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the opposite party no.1 within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice."

¶9

Taking note of the facts as indicated including the submission advanced by learned State Counsel, which is to the effect that revision instituted by the petitioner was dismissed for want of prosecution on 12.07.2023 and thereafter an application for restoration of revision was filed on 18.10.2023, which appears to be filed with some delay, the present petition is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.1/Board of Revenue, Lucknow, to decide the application in issue, quoted in the prayer clause, as per law after taking note of issue relating to delay in filing the application, expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within two months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.

¶10

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶11

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 7.3.2024

¶13

Jyoti/-

¶14

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Sagar v. Board of Revenue U.P Lko. Thru. Its Chairman and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Sagar v. Board of Revenue U.P Lko. Thru. Its Chairman and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd.Basir Khan Vs A.D.C.

Ram Udit Pal and Another Vs Add. Commissioner Judicial Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya and 2 Others

Ran Jeet Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Sri Thakur Mahraj, Virajman Mandir, Deoria Thru. Sarvarakar Triloki Nath Jaiswal and Others Vs Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Others

Shyam Lal Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others

Smt. Anjum Fatima Ashraf @ Anjum Fatima Jafri Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. U.P. and 6 Others