Disposed

Omprakash @ O.P. Rawat @ Santosh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Allahabad HC23 Oct 2024/9359/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It directed the applicant to furnish a personal bond and two sureties in one case only, such that this bond shall be deemed valid for all other pending cases where bail has been passed.

What did the court decide?

Applicant directed to furnish personal bond and two sureties in one case; said bond to be valid for all other cases.

Omprakash @ O.P. Rawat @ Santosh Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71530

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9359 of 2024 Applicant :- Omprakash @ O.P. Rawat @ Santosh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kr. Sharma,Arshad Hafeez Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in criminal history of the applicant, total 5 criminal cases have been registered, details of which are as under:-

¶8

(i) Case Crime No. 38/2024, under Section 394 I.P.C., Police Station- Baddupur, District Barabanki;

¶9

(ii) Case Crime No. 265/2024, under Section 307, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police StationSafdarganj, District Barabanki;

¶10

(iii) Case Crime No. 198/2024, under Section 3(1) of UP Gangster Act, Police Station- Baddupur, District Barabanki;

¶11

(iv) Case Crime No. 210/2024, under Section 392/411 I.P.C., Police Station- Safdarganj, District Barabanki;

¶12

(v) Case Crime No. 266/2024, under Section 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station- Safdarganj, District Barabanki;

¶13

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that furnishing of two sureties in all 5

¶14

different cases is almost impracticable as the applicant is facing hardship and he will not be able to arrange the same to get bail.

¶15

It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner/applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid fact, the application (u/s 482 Cr.P.C.) is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two sureties in one case which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail order has been passed.

¶17

Order Date :- 23.10.2024 V. Sinha

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Omprakash @ O.P. Rawat @ Santosh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Omprakash @ O.P. Rawat @ Santosh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Gulam Jilani Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 5 Others

Raj Kumari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and 2 Others

Nagendra Nath Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another

Manju Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Shatrughan Dwivedi and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Wahid Khan and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others