Allowed

Sachin Nayar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allahabad HC27 Aug 2024/9095/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application sought enlargement for the applicant, Sachin Nayar, in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The court, noting he was already on bail in related gang chart cases and finding no ground for denial, allowed the application.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail in FIR No. 219 of 2024 by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, subject to conditions of attendance and against tampering.

Sachin Nayar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58156

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9095 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Sachin Nayar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Suryavanshi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard Ms. Swati Singh holding brief of Sri Himanshu Suryavanshi, learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.219 of 2024, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow.

¶8

3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart. The copies of the bail orders are on record.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Sachin Nayar be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 27.8.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sachin Nayar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Nayar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Zaade Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Meraj @ Bablu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Riti Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home. Deptt. Civil. Secy. Lko. and 3 Others

Moin and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin Secy. Home Lko.

U.P. State Industrial Development Authority,Trans Ganga City,Unnao Thru. Its Senior Project Officer vs Deepak Dwivedi

Pramod Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others