The court allowed bail to the applicant charged under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and POCSO Act. The decision was based on the victim's statements not supporting the prosecution story and the applicant's lack of criminal antecedents.
Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bonds and two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58139
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9103 of 2024
Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the
offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 27.8.2024 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail given victim statements contradicting prosecution story.
Whether the applicant has criminal antecedents warranting refusal of bail.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Pramod Kumar
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
