Smt. Sadhana v. Gaurav Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge displayed the transfer application. Absent the applicant's counsel with no adjournmentrequest, the writ petition was dismissed in default.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:51088
Court No. - 19
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 88 of 2022
Applicant :- Smt. Sadhana Opposite Party :- Gaurav Kumar Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Srivastava,Durgesh Kumar Singh,Padmakar Nath Tripathi,Rekha Kumari Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rakesh Pandey,Sanjay Kumar Pandey,Vashishtha Pandey
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 26.7.2024
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt. Sadhana
Coram
Manish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- /88/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mesers Bajaj Capital Insurence Broking Ltd.Lucknow Vs Shiman Vidit Pradhikari and Sahayak Sharm Ayukt U.P. Lucknow
Shiv Prasad and 3 Ors. Vs Additional District Judge/Special Judge Essential and 5 Ors.
Yakoob Ali Vs Appellate Authority/Chief Judicial Magistrate Shrawasti andORS
Subhashini Alias Jyoti Vs Shiv Kumar and Anr.