The High Court at Allahabad dismissed a writ petition in default for the non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel, who did not seek an adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:50548
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1000128 of 2011
Petitioner :- Mesers Bajaj Capital Insurence Broking Ltd.Lucknow Respondent :- Shiman Vidit Pradhikari And Sahayak Sharm Ayukt U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
Writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 25.7.2024 Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mesers Bajaj Capital Insurence Broking Ltd.Lucknow
Shiman Vidit Pradhikari And Sahayak Sharm Ayukt U.P. Lucknow
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
