In a contempt application by Manoj Kumar Yadav and 4 Others, the court found that the opposite party demonstrated compliance with a prior writ court order. The court held that no contempt was made out and dismissed the petition.
Contempt petition dismissed; notices against the applicant discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 83 of 2022
Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Yadav And 4 Others Opposite Party :- Bholendra Pratap Singh, District Basic Edu. Officer
Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Om Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Neeraj Chaurasiya
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out. None present for the applicants.
Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the order dated 27.10.2021 passed by the writ Court has been complied with, vide order dated 7.10.2022. He has placed a copy of the aforesaid order which is taken on record and that shall be part of the record.
In view of the aforesaid, no contempt is made out.
Notices are discharged.
Hence, contempt petition is dismissed .
Consigned to the record.
Order Date :- 12.2.2024 Ram Murti
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed given compliance with the writ court order.
Whether the notices against the applicant require to be maintained.
Whether the applicant failed to appear for the hearing.
Manoj Kumar Yadav and 4 Others
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
