Contempt application against a District Inspector of Schools dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was absent and made no request for adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:12705
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 23 of 2022
Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Opposite Party :- Omkar Rana(D.I.O.S.) Counsel for Applicant :- Adarsh Kumar Maurya,Yogendra Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None is present on behalf of the applicant to press the application.
From the perusal of the order sheet, it transpires that the case was adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the applicant, however, this time, no request has been made for adjournment of the case.
It seems that the applicant has no interest to press the application.
The application is dismissed accordingly for want of prosecution.
Consigned to the records.
Order Date :- 12.2.2024 Ram Murti
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ajay Kumar
Omkar Rana (D.I.O.S.)
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
