Disposed

Ramakant Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Cane Developement Deptt. Lko and Another

Allahabad HC12 Sept 2024/7818/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of at the admission stage without entering into merits. The High Court directed the Principal Secretary Cane and Sugar Industries to consider and dispose of the petitioner's statutory revision within two months via a reasoned order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Principal Secretary Cane and Sugar Industries to consider and decide the petitioner's statutory revision within two months by a reasoned order.

Ramakant Maurya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Cane… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63322

¶2

Court No. - 4

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7818 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Ramakant Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Cane Developement Deptt. Lko And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Srivastava,Jaideep Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

Heard Shri Jaideep Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri R.A. Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶7

By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following main relief(s):-

¶8

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the opposite party no.2 to decide the statutory revision dated 04.06.2024 submitted by registered post on 06.06.2024 contained in annexure no.1 to this writ petition within the time schedule to be fixed by the Hon'ble High Court. "

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an innocuous prayer that a direction may be issued to the opposite party no. 2 i.e., Principal Secretary Cane and Sugar Industries, U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow to consider and dispose of the statutory revision dated 4.6.2024 of the petitioner with expedition.

¶10

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction for disposal of the aforesaid statutory revision is issued.

¶11

Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, this writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage directing the opposite party no.2 i.e., Principal Secretary Cane and Sugar Industries, U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow to consider and dispose of the aforesaid statutory revision of the petitioner

¶12

dated 4.6.2024 (Annexure-1) by speaking and reasoned order strictly in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.

¶13

Order Date :- 12.9.2024 Shravan

¶14

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ramakant Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Cane Developement Deptt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramakant Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Cane Developement Deptt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dr. Vijay Jhalani and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ayush Anubhag-I, Lko. and 3 Others

Tej Bhan Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies Deptt. Lko and 2 Others

Bablu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko.

Rajesh Prajapati vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Home New Delhi and 2 Others

Manoj Kumar Tripathi vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 4 Others

Ramakant Maurya vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Cane Developement Deptt. Lko and Another