Dismissed¶14

Viresh Kumar Verma @ Urli v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt.

Allahabad HC26 Sept 2024/7277/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail application rejected — murder/kidnapping/destruction-of-evidence charges (Sections 302, 364, 201 IPC), Case Crime No. 10 of 2020, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Hardoi; earlier bail application No. 3458 of 2021 rejected 24.07.2023; no fresh ground; P.W.-1 (wife of deceased) supported prosecution alleging Rs.50,000/- advance and killing of deceased; P.W.-2 doctor examined; applicant Viresh Kumar Verma @ Urli; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; Brij Raj Singh, J.; order dated 26.9.2024; neutral citation 2024:AHC-LKO:67018.

What did the court decide?

The first bail application of the applicant was rejected after considering the statement of P.W.-1, wife of the deceased, and there is no fresh ground. ¶13

Viresh Kumar Verma @ Urli Vs State of U.P… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:67018

¶2

Court No. - 28

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7277 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Viresh Kumar Verma @ Urli Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Nigam,Khushbu Tripathi,Rubi Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.

¶6

1. Learned counsel for the applicant has refused to file rejoinder affidavit.

¶7

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rakesh Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶8

3. This is second bail application, the first bail application bearing Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3458 of 2021 has been rejected by a detailed order dated 24.07.2023.

¶9

4. The present second bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.10 of 2020 under Sections 302,364 and 201 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Hardoi.

¶10

5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that P.W.-2 doctor has been examined and after looking into the statement of the doctor, it could not be inferred that the applicant was involved in the commission of crime as such the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶11

6. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has submitted that statement of P.W.-1 has been recorded, who is the wife of

¶12

the deceased and she has supported the prosecution case. She deposed before the court that the applicant had called the deceased and asked for his amount Rs.50,000/- which was given as advance by him and thereafter the deceased was done to death. The entire arguments have been considered in the rejection of first bail order ,therefore, there is no cause of action and It has been submitted by learned A.G.A. that the bail application of the applicant is liable to be rejected.

¶13

7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering overall facts of the case as well as the argument that the first bail application of the applicant was rejected after considering the statement of P.W.-1, wife of the deceased and the argument that there is no fresh ground,therefore, I am of the opinion that the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.

¶14

8. The bail application of the applicant is rejected.

¶15

(Brij Raj Singh, J.)

¶16

Order Date :- 26.9.2024 dk/

¶17

Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Viresh Kumar Verma @ Urli v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Viresh Kumar Verma @ Urli v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anurag Singh vs Principal Judge Family Court, Lucknow and 2 Others

Prashant Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. and Another

Prashant Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Devraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civiil Sectt. Lko.

Madan Nag Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Devraj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civiil Sectt. Lko.