The High Court at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) accepted an Article 227 petition challenging interim maintenance orders. It noted an arguable case regarding the court's consideration of the petitioner's unemployment and inability to pay, thereby issuing notice to the respondent for reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 15
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4581 of 2024
Petitioner :- Anurag Singh Respondent :- Principal Judge Family Court, Lucknow And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Tripathi,Nida Navi
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
"(i) to set aside the order dated 21.07.2023 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Court No.3, Family Court, Lucknow.;
(ii) to set aside the order dated 25.04.2022, passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow;
(iii) to issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
7. List this case on 25.10.2024.
Order Date :- 25.9.2024 Praveen
Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether arguable case has been made out to set aside interim maintenance orders and rejection of recall application under Article 227 of the Constitution
Whether maintenance granted without considering petitioner's financial capability warrants judicial intervention
Anurag Singh
Principal Judge Family Court, Lucknow
Additional Principal Judge, Court No.3, Family Court, Lucknow
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
