Disposed

C/M Lala Ram Kumar Vidyalaya Patranga Thru. Minister Ajay Kumrey Tivari v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko and 3 Others

Allahabad HC8 Nov 2024/6253/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging school management orders was disposed of. With no Committee of Management existing, the court directed the competent authority to appoint an authorized controller as recommended by the District Inspector of Schools within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed competent authority to appoint authorized controller as per law within six weeks.

C/M Lala Ram Kumar Vidyalaya Patranga Thru… — Education and Admissions | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73928

¶2

Court No. - 5

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6253 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- C/M Lala Ram Kumar Vidyalaya Patranga Thru. Minister Ajay Kumrey Tivari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshuman Singh Rathore,Anindya Shastri,Rajeev Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ghanshyam Verma

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Anshuman Singh Rathore, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents no.1 to 3, and Sri Ghanshyam Verma, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4.

¶7

Instant petition has been filed by the Committee of Management Lala Ram Kumar Vidyalaya Patranga through its Minister Ajay Kumrey raising a challenge to the orders impugned dated 20.06.2024 and 19.07.2024, copies of which are Annexures 1 and 2 to the petition, passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Ayodhya.

¶8

A preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Ghanshyam Verma, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4, that the instant petition though allegedly filed by the Committee of Management yet there is no Committee of Management functional at the moment.

¶9

Responding to that, Sri Rathore fairly states that there is no Committee of Management in existence rather the affidavit filed in support of the petition indicates that the affidavit has been filed by the Minister of the Society.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid and without entering into the controversy as to whether the writ petition filed by the Society is maintainable or not but at the same time considering the peculiar facts of the case where there is no Committee of Management and that the DIOS vide order dated 20.07.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-4 to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.4, has recommended for appointment of an authorized controller to the Director of Education, Prayagraj/Lucknow, as such, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to proceed with the

¶11

request of the DIOS Ayodhya as made through letter dated 20.07.2024 for appointment of an authorized controller as per law and relevant rules.

¶12

Let necessary orders in this regard be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶13

Order Date :- 8.11.2024 A. Katiyar

¶14

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

C/M Lala Ram Kumar Vidyalaya Patranga Thru. Minister Ajay Kumrey Tivari v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C/M Lala Ram Kumar Vidyalaya Patranga Thru. Minister Ajay Kumrey Tivari v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amita Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 2 Others

Salman Khan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Ankit Kumar Bharti Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Urban Development Lko and 3 Others

Rama Shanker @ Rama Shankar Mishra vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Telecomm. Mini. of Communi. New Delhi and 2 Others

Vishram Prasad Sonkar vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Telecommunication New Delhi and 2 Others

Satya Prakash Chaturvedi and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance Lko. and 5 Others