Dismissed¶15
Mohd. Tanveer v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others
Allahabad HC/617/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance; wife residing away for sufficient cause, destitute, no source of income; minor son's maintenance; husband a Madarsha teacher, actual salary not proved; Family Court Sitapur order dated 02.04.2024 upheld; criminal revision dismissed; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.
What did the court decide?
Respondent No.2 is the legally wedded wife of the revisionist and respondent No.3 is his minor son; the liability of their maintenance is on the revisionist. ¶13