Partly allowed

Bittoo Jaiswal @ Kamlesh Jaiswal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Allahabad HC31 May 2024/5127/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant sought to furnish a single personal bond and two sureties for three separate criminal cases instead of separate bonds, citing financial hardship. The court allowed the prayer, permitting the applicant to furnish a personal bond and two sureties valid for all mentioned cases.

What did the court decide?

It is provided that the applicant may furnish a personal bond and two sureties which shall be treated to be valid in all the above mentioned cases.

Bittoo Jaiswal @ Kamlesh Jaiswal Vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:41858

¶2

Court No. - 15

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5127 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Bittoo Jaiswal @ Kamlesh Jaiswal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Manjusha Kapil Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to direct the learned trial court not to insist the applicant to file separate surety bonds in three cases and accept only two sureties in lieu of three cases.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the cases shown in paragraph 4 of the application. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been released on bail in following cases:-

¶9

"(i) Case Crime No.0092 of 2022, under section 307 I.P.C., Police tation- Cantt, DistrictLucknow.

¶10

(ii) Case Crime No. - 0082 of 2022, under section- 452/ 342/ 302/120- B Indian Penal Code, Police StationCantt, DistrictLucknow.

¶11

(iii) Case Crime No. - 93 of 2022, Under Section- 3/25 Arms Act,Police Station Cantt,, District - Lucknow."

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to poor financial condition, the applicant is not in a position to manage sureties in all the three cases. He seeks benefit of judgment passed by Hon'be Supreme Court of India in "Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of U.P." passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No. 8914-8915 of 2018.

¶13

Opposing the prayer of the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State submits that it is always the discretion and satisfaction of the concerned trial court so far as the acceptance of the surety is concerned.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid, it is provided that the applicant may furnish a personal bond and two sureties which shall be treated to be valid in all the cases, above mentioned, in which the bail orders have been passed.

¶15

With these observations, the petition is disposed of.

¶16

Order Date :- 31.5.2024 Madhu

¶17

Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Bittoo Jaiswal @ Kamlesh Jaiswal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bittoo Jaiswal @ Kamlesh Jaiswal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shashi Pandey Alias Shashi Dwivedi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Smt. Guddi Devi @ Gaytri Tripathi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Mahanth Raghuvar Sharan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Mohd. Tanveer Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Munna Khan Alias Razi Khan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Ramesh Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another