This writ petition challenging the rejection of a grievance regarding selection of posts was dismissed on grounds of excessive delay and loss of cause due to a 2010 government order altering recruitment under a subsequent Act.
Dismissed the writ petition and held that parties must bear their own cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:51566
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5876 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Seema Maurya Respondent :- Dist. Magistrate /Chairman Dist. Edu.Committee Barabanki And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Prasad,Samar Singh Rawat Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Uday Veer Singh
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 prabhat
Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the rejection of causes regarding selection of posts is maintainable considering significant delay and change in law.
Smt. Seema Maurya
Dist. Magistrate /Chairman Dist. Edu.Committee Barabanki
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
