Single-judge order in a contempt application. The applicant was absent. The court found the petition barred by limitation due to lack of formal notice issuance, dismissing the application without further argument. Quality is thin as it is a dismissal order based on procedural bar.
Contempt application dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14037
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 58 of 2022
Applicant :- Ranjeet Singh Opposite Party :- Mohan Lal Gupta, Upzila Adhikari Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar,Rajesh Kumar
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None is present for the petitioner to press this contempt petition.
From perusal of the record, it transpires that this contempt petition has been filed for non compliance of the order passed by the writ court dated 01-12-2020 and no notice has been issued to the opposite parties in this matter as yet.
In view of aforesaid, the contempt petition is barred by limitation. It is dismissed accordingly.
Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 16.2.2024 AKS
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is barred by limitation due to failure to issue notice to opposite parties.
Ranjeet Singh
Mohan Lal Gupta
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
