Indra Pal Shukla v. Raju Chief Account Officer U.P. Jal Nigam Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
This one-sentence contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared to press the petition on the adjourned date.
This one-sentence contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared to press the petition on the adjourned date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:13678
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2337 of 2021
Applicant :- Indra Pal Shukla Opposite Party :- Raju Chief Account Officer U.P. Jal Nigam Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vashu Deo Mishra,S.K. Mishra Nagraha,Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rishabh Kapoor
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out. None is present for the petitioner to press this petition.
Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the opposite party is present.
The contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 15.2.2024 Anurag
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Indra Pal Shukla
Anurag Singh
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court