Dismissed
Daya Ram and Others v. Record Officer/ Ziladhikari, Ayodhya and Others
Allahabad HC/573/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:6639 Court No. - 7 Case…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:6639 Court No. - 7 Case…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:6639
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 573 of 2024
Petitioner :- Daya Ram And Others Respondent :- Record Officer/ Ziladhikari, Ayodhya And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Pratap Singh,P.K. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Heard Sri Rakesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State Counsel.
The present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the order dated 02.01.2024 passed by opposite party no.1, i.e., Record Officer/ Ziladhikari, Ayodhya in Case No.2331/2023 (Computerized Case no.D202304230002331) under Section 49(8) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 titled as Daya Ram and Others vs. Gaon Sabha and Others and the order dated 31.07.2023 passed by opposite party no.2, i.e., Assistant Record Officer, Ayodhya in Case no.1391/2023 (Computerized Case no.D202304230001391) under Section 49 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 titled as Gram Sabha Rampur Halwara vs. Daya Ram and Others as contained in Annexure No.1 & 2 to this writ petition.
"(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties, not to interfere into peaceful use and possession of the petitioners and not to dispossess them from their land Khata No.438 Gata No.45Min. aread 10Bigha, situated at village Majha Rampur Halwara, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya."
At the very outset, learned State Counsel says that the present writ petition is not liable to be entertained in view of the remedy available to the petitioners in the statute itself.
The remedy indicated has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners.
Considering the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the
law.
In case, the remedy as available is availed by the petitioners within 15 days from today, the authority concerned shall endeavour to conclude the proceedings within six months, if possible, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.
In case an application for interim relief is preferred by the petitioners, the same shall also be considered and decided expeditiously.
Order Date :- 23.1.2024 Manoj K.
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Daya Ram And Others
Record Officer/ Ziladhikari, Ayodhya And Others
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court