The application under Section 482 was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representative appeared for the applicant on the hearing date, and no adjournment was sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:57386
Court No. - 19
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5322 of 2016
Applicant :- Smt. Hamraaz Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out.
Neither anyone is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application which was filed in the year 2016, nor any request for adjournment of the case has been made.
The learned A.G.A. is present on behalf of the State.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
The interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 22.8.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Hamraaz
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
