Disposed

Md. Vaseem v. the Commissioner Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, Faizabad and Others

Allahabad HC25 Oct 2024/5225/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an Article 227 petition seeking expeditious disposal of a revision, the Allahabad High Court directed the respondent authority to finally decide the pending case under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, immediately without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to consider and finally decide the pending revision proceedings expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

Md. Vaseem Vs the Commissioner Ayodhya… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:72119

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5225 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Md. Vaseem

¶5

Respondent :- The Commissioner Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh

¶6

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Mohan Singh learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent Gaon Sabha.

¶8

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos.4 to 12 is dispensed with.

¶9

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the Revision bearing Computerized Case No.C202204000002300 filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1 .

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of e Revision bearing Computerized Case No.C202204000002300 filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 25.10.2024 Harshita

¶15

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Md. Vaseem v. the Commissioner Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, Faizabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Vaseem v. the Commissioner Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, Faizabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Binda Gupta and Another Vs Addl. Commissioner, (Judicial), Prayagraj Division Prayagraj and Others

Ibrar Khan and Others Vs Addl. Commissioner (Administration ), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

Awadhesh Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Collector, Deoria and Others

Md. Vaseem vs the Commissioner Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, Faizabad and Others

M/S Raj Corporation Limited Thru. Authorized Signatory Priyanshu Yadav vs Engineer-in-Chief and Head of Department, Public Works Department and others

Ankita Verma vs Sarvesh Kumar