The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in writ jurisdiction under Article 227, examined a petition seeking review of an impugned Family Court judgment from Kasundi. The court noted the need for additional facts and denied their examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:66713
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4583 of 2024 Petitioner :- Roop Chandra Nai Respondent :- Harilal And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Bhushan Singh,Pranjal Apurva,Sandeep Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi,J.]
Order Date :- 26.9.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to examine the validity of the impugned judgment of the Family Court under Article 227.
Whether additional facts need to be examined before deciding on the writ application for review of the Family Court's judgment.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to rely on the proceedings in another court as additional facts for the current writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Roop Chandra Nai
Harilal
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
