The High Court, Lucknow Bench dismissed a second appeal for want of prosecution as none of the appellant's counsel appeared, nor was there any request for adjournment.
Second Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:21805
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 44 of 2024
Appellant :- Smt. Rajdulari Respondent :- Fozi Ahmad Ali And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd. Shakeel Counsel for Respondent :- In Person
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised. None is present on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The order has been passed in presence of Shri Sunil Kumar Khare, respondent no.3-in-person.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 13.3.2024 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Rajdulari
Fozi Ahmad Ali
Rajnish Kumar
Ram Naresh Banswar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
