Petitioners filed an Article 227 petition impleading the Civil Judge, seeking expeditious disposal of Suit No. 1391 of 2024. Relying on Supreme Court rulings that judges should not be made parties to petitions, the court disposed of the petition with directions to amend the cause title.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:62794
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4359 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Teerath And Another
Respondent :- Civil Judge (Junior Division) Gonda And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Mishra Rudra Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi,J.]
Order Date :- 11.9.2024/Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition impleading the Civil Judge as a party could proceed for expeditious disposal of a suit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Savitri Devi v. District Judge, GorakhpurReferred
(1999) 2 SCC 577 · Who else cites this
Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, KotahReferred
(2015) 9 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Ram Teerath And Another
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Gonda
10 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
