The Single Judge considered a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of proceedings related to land acquisition by skipping the mandatory procedure of issuing a notice under Section 6 of the U.P. Land Acquisition Act, 2006.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:35772
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4193 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ankit Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 9.5.2024/Sumit
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KAPOOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition lie under Article 226 to challenge the land acquisition process where Notice Under Section 6 of PRI Act is prescribed in the petition.
Whether the Petitioner can claim that there is no provision for grant of declaration within the proviso.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ankit Kumar Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow And Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
