A writ petition seeking vacation of an industrial agreement affecting lawyers was returned as not maintainable as industrial disputes are outside the court's scope; petitioner urged for vacation of the agreement. One-paragraph order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:35771
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4180 of 2024
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Seema Upadhyay,Chandra Bhanu Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Shailendra Singh Rajawat
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
67 (5) कके असिंरग र ्ता अपश्रील ससिं० डश्री 202304710000939 यमोधजर ककी गई हशै जमो अभश्री लसिंचबर हशै।
Order Date :- 9.5.2024 Sumit
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KAPOOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Industrial Agreement imposing restrictions on lawyers must be vacated under Article 226?
Whether this writ petition is maintainable?
Shiv Kumar Upadhyay
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
