Dulara v. State of U.P. Thru.Secy. Home, Lucknow and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
PIL misuse / locus standi: PIL No. 406 of 2024, Dulara v. State of U.P. (encroachment on Gata Nos. 172 and 151, Village Jalim Kheda Majra Gujauli Sarvan, District Unnao), dismissed by Subhash Vidyarthi, J., Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, on 10.5.2024 (neutral citation 2024:AHC-LKO:36248), because the petition and affidavit were signed only by the petitioner's son Puttan Lal, indicating ulterior motive; Court flagged the trend of PILs filed to settle personal scores and the remedy under Section 67, U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
What did the court decide?
Neither the writ petition nor the affidavit in its support bears the petitioner's signature or thumb impression; both were signed by her 45-year-old son, and it appears the deponent filed the writ petition with some ulterior motive in his mother's name instead of filing it in his own name.