Disposed

C/M, Thru. Manager, Gayatri Devi Public Inter College, Sultanpur and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Secondary Education, Lucknow and Others

Allahabad HC16 Jan 2024/344/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking allotment of the petitioner institution as an examination centre for the U.P. Board Examination 2024. The court granted liberty to submit a fresh representation before the Secretary of the Intermediate Education Board for consideration per relevant Government Order.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file afresh representation before the Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, to be considered within ten days.

C/M, Thru. Manager, Gayatri Devi Public Inter… — Education and Admissions | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4147

¶2

Court No. - 17

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 344 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- C/M, Thru. Manager, Gayatri Devi Public Inter College, Sultanpur And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy., Secondary Education, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.

¶7

Learned counsel for petitioners is granted liberty to implead Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, (Intermediate Education Board) Uttar Pradesh, Civil Line, Prayagraj as opposite party no.4 during the course of day. Learned State counsel has accepted notices on behalf of newly impleaded opposite party.

¶8

Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to allot Examination Centre to petitioner's Institution for the U.P Board Examination 2024.

¶9

It has been submitted that petitioner's Institution fulfills all the requirements for allocation as an Examination Centre for the aforesaid Board Examinations particularly in view of the fact that it is co-education Institution and the Centre allocated is more than seven kilometers away which would entail difficulty for the female candidates.

¶10

Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to furnish afresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, (Intermediate Education Board) Uttar Pradesh, Civil Line, Prayagraj or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide, keeping in view the relevant Government Order pertaining to same within a period of ten days from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before said authority.

¶11

With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 16.1.2024 Subodh/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

C/M, Thru. Manager, Gayatri Devi Public Inter College, Sultanpur and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Secondary Education, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C/M, Thru. Manager, Gayatri Devi Public Inter College, Sultanpur and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Secondary Education, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kripa Shankar Kashyap Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education and 4 Others

Abdul Ahad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Minority Welfare and Waqf Lko. and 3 Others

Brijendra Nath Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Urban Development Lko and 3 Others

Nritya Kala Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education, Govt. U.P. Lucknow and 3 Others

Shyam Kumari Group of Pharmacy College, Prayagraj Thru. Manager Devendra Mishra and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Technical Education Lucknow and Others

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs Managing Director /Chief Executive Officer Union Bank of India Mumbai Maharashtra and 4 Others