Petitioner challenged lower court's order refusing quashing of cheque-bounce proceedings under Section 7 CrPC. Court held reliance on Section 420 IPC was insufficient for quashing under Article 226. Reference was described briefly without detailed grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27276
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3105 of 2024
Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Amethi And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Chandra,Vivek Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
67 उ्ቈरि ्ቚ दकेश रियाजस्वि स च ंहरया कके अन्रग वियाद सचंख्यया टቦኍ 202204710102843 चविचियारियाधिቦኍन हकै, धजसमम अचगम चरधथ 19.04.2024 चनयर हकै।
Order Date :- 3.4.2024 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for quashing proceedings under Section 7 CrPC for cheque-related offence was maintainable.
Whether the reference to Section 420 IPC provides sufficient material for invoking quashing power.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Manoj Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Amethi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
