In a contempt application, the court dismissed the petition, holding that no contempt was made out as the respondent had already complied with the writ court order by deciding the applicant's representation.
The instant contempt application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:59912
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3028 of 2024
Applicant :- M/S. Indira Enterprises Thru. Its Proprietor Ramshankar
Opposite Party :- Smt. Aditi Sharma, Director, Nawab Wazid Ali Shah Zoological Garden Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Lalit Kishore Tiwari,Vinod Kumar Dixit
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
It is informed that the representation of the application has been decided on 20.06.2024.
Order Date :- 30.8.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is in contempt given compliance with the writ court order via a representation decision.
M/s. Indira Enterprises Thru. Its Proprietor Ramshankar
Smt. Aditi Sharma
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
