Vanshika Srivastava v. Principal Judge (Family Court) Distt. Lko. and 2 Others
Allahabad HC/2891/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:42808 Court No. - 4 Case…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:42808 Court No. - 4 Case…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:42808
Court No. - 4
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2891 of 2024
Petitioner :- Vanshika Srivastava Respondent :- Principal Judge (Family Court) Distt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Mishra,Brijesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.
No notice be issued to private respondents taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent No.1 i.e. Principal Judge (Family Court), Lucknow to expeditiously decide the Case No.1777 of 2024 in re: Vanshika Srivastava Vs. Devang Sinha filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by preparing mirror order of the judgment and order dated 01.11.2022j passed in Case No. 22-1150-F 425 by the learned District Court, 425th, Judicial District Willamson County, Texas.
The Court is not inclined to issue directions in a matter such as the present merely because a party has moved this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution to direct the concerned Court to decide the pending case overriding several cases which are equally pressing and are pending, by granting priority to a particular case. The fact that a particular case requires urgent disposal is to be considered by the concerned Court itself.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to move an application before the concerned Court pointing out the grounds of urgency. In the event, the petitioner does so, the concerned Court may consider whether the case should be expedited having regard to the urgency of the case.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Order Date :- 10.6.2024 Pachhere/-
Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue directions to the Family Court to decide a pending matrimonial matter by granting priority to the petitioner's specific case.
Vanshika Srivastava
Principal Judge (Family Court) Distt. Lko.
2 Others
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court