Allowed

Kuldeep Singh Alias Deepak Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. of Home Lko.

Allahabad HC21 Mar 2024/2850/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge criminal court allowed a bail application for the applicant in a 2023 FIR under the U.P. Gangsters Act, citing his existing bail status in two other cases under the same Act as a material consideration.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant to be released on bail in FIR No.0175 of 2023 with a personal bond of two sureties.

Kuldeep Singh Alias Deepak Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:25154

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2850 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Alias Deepak Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the basis for invoking the provisions of Gangsters Act against the applicant is the two cases which have been shown in the gang chart and in the said two cases, the applicant is on bail. Hence, the applicant who is in custody since 25.7.2023, may be released on bail.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in two cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail.

¶10

Accordingly, the present application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Kuldeep Singh @ Deepak Singh be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No.0175 of 2023, under Sections 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Samngrampur, District Amethi on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: -

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence

¶14

similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 21.3.2024

¶17

Shukla

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Kuldeep Singh Alias Deepak Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Singh Alias Deepak Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pankaj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Ashish Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Civil Secrett. Lko.

Rohit Sahu @ Rohit Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Safi Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Aditya Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Kamlesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko