The single judge dismissed the contempt application on the record as proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code had been concluded, finding no violation of the writ order.
Contempt notices discharged; contempt petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:20564
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2566 of 2023
Applicant :- Ram Surat Opposite Party :- Shri Raj Kapoor, Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil-Aalapur, Circle-Ram Nagar, Ambedkar Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Om Prakash Yadav
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None is present for either of the parties.
From perusal of the record, it transpires that the order passed by the writ court dated 16-02-2023 has been complied with in it's letter and spirit as the proceedings under section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have been concluded vide order dated 29-09-2023, copy of which is appended alongwith Compliance AfÏdavit.
In view of aforesaid, no contempt is made out.
The contempt notices are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition is dismissed.
Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 6.3.2024 AKS
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is guilty of contempt for failing to comply with the writ court order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Surat
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
