In a contempt application regarding non-compliance with a prior order directing expedited consideration of an objection under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, the court disposed of the matter by directing the applicant to move an application before the respondent for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:47421
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2500 of 2024
Applicant :- Shanti Devi Opposite Party :- Shri Anil Kumar Singh Bisen, Consolidation Officer, Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Shekher Pandey
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
Considering the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the opposite party no. 2 is dispensed with.
The objection of the petitioner under Section 9-A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 is said to be pending since 2008.
Let the Consolidation Officer consider and decide the same if there is no other legal impediment in this regard with expedition, say, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is submitted.
With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. "
Order Date :- 12.7.2024 V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shanti Devi
Shri Anil Kumar Singh Bisen
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
