A bail application for an applicant accused of abducting a minor was allowed. The court relied on the victim's statement of free consent and an intact hymen in the medical report, noting the applicant's lack of criminal history.
The applicant is released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:18074
Court No. - 27
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2058 of 2024
Applicant :- Sohanlal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Gargi Prakash Misra,Sunita Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 28.2.2024 Preeti.
Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for bail despite allegations of abducting a minor under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and POCSO.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Sohanlal
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
