Disposed

Ankur Chopra and Another v. Addl. Judge Small Causes Court No 19 Lko. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC23 Apr 2024/1974/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 227 seeking orders for expeditious disposal of a matrimonial suit, the High Court declined to pass judicial directions due to existing administrative mandates regarding pendency. Instead, it granted liberty to the petitioner to file a urgency application before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file an urgency application before the trial court; prayer for High Court directions rejected.

Ankur Chopra and Another Vs Addl. Judge Small… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:31623

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1974 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Ankur Chopra And Another Respondent :- Addl. Judge Small Causes Court No 19 Lko. And 4 Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Amresh Bahadur Singh,Anand Kumar Singh

¶6

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

¶9

By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Regular Suit No.1202 of 2020 (Now Civil Suit No. 1621 of 2023) (Abhay Prtap Singh Vs. Ankur Chopra and others) for permanent injunction pending before Additional Judge, Small Causes Court No. 19, Lucknow.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are the defendants in the said suit. It is further stated that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case Additional Judge, Small Causes Court No. 19, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶11

In this regard, it is noteworthy, that this Court on administrative side has already issued directions to the Courts below to obtain zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this Court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side. Hence, the prayer is rejected.

¶12

However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move

¶13

appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the suit before the trial Court. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial Court shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial Court is prima facie satisfied that a case for urgency is made out it shall pass suitable orders thereon.

¶14

With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of .

¶15

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶16

Order Date :- 23.4.2024 Virendra

¶17

Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ankur Chopra and Another v. Addl. Judge Small Causes Court No 19 Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankur Chopra and Another v. Addl. Judge Small Causes Court No 19 Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Lakhan and Others Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Faizabad and Others

Vikram Dixit Vs the Court, Additional Principal Judge Room No. 7 Family Court Lko. and Another

Vinay Shanker Singh Vs Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 15 , Sultanpur and 5 Others

Saroj Sengar Vs Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 15, Distt. Sultanpur and 2 Others

Sita Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Panchayat Raj Lko. and 5 Others

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Civil Sectt. Govt. Lko. and 2 Others